Sold! NYC Apartments Go for $5.4 Billion

October 18th, 2006

Wednesday October 18, 2006 10:01 AM

By AMY WESTFELDT

Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP) – It’s not often that Manhattan apartment dwellers compare their neighborhood to a small town.

But the 25,000-person community of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village is unusual: residents stay for decades, children play outside, friends gather on park benches.

Metlife Inc. announced Tuesday that the complex – one of the nation’s largest – has been sold to a developer for $5.4 billion. Now, residents worry the character of the place will be changed.

Even though rent stabilization protections remain, many fear they will eventually be pushed out of their homes by rising costs.

My husband grew up here, it's a part of his history, his parents live here still,'' said resident Joan Colten.We very much want to remain in the neighborhood.’’

Generations of families of lawyers, teachers and firefighters have lived in the 110 apartment buildings originally built for returning World War II veterans. Many have called it the last bastion of middle-class housing in Manhattan’s supercharged real estate market.

The buildings along the East River include mostly below-market, rent-stabilized apartments, a community center where women gather and play bridge, and private parkland. The distinct brick buildings can be seen from blocks away and the winding streets within can make the area feel like its own city.

MetLife, one of the nation’s largest insurers, announced the sale of the apartments to the Tishman Speyer development company in a joint venture with BlackRock Realty, the real estate arm of BlackRock Inc.

The opportunity to buy 11,000 apartments in a terrific neighborhood in this city doesn't come along very often, maybe once in a generation,'' said Robert Speyer, Tishman Speyer's senior managing director.You live for opportunities like this one.’’

The $5.4 billion price tag makes the sale one of the biggest residential real estate deals ever. The price beat a tenant-backed bid of $4.5 billion for the properties, as well as several other bids.

Speyer said the residents of rent-stabilized apartments are protected by law and will be able to keep paying the below-market prices as long as they still live there. He said there are no plans to convert any of the apartments into condominiums.

``We don’t want Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village to be a place of pied-a-terres over the long term, a luxury gated community, one which is only accessible to the richest New Yorkers,’’ said City Councilman Daniel Garodnick, a resident who was part of the proposed offer.

Source: The Guardian

Poll results on real estate attitudes

October 12th, 2006

The Associated Press-AOL Real Estate poll on public attitudes about
shopping for homes was conducted Sept. 26-28 by Ipsos and is based on telephone
interviews Ipsos conducted with 2,001 adults from all states except Alaska and
Hawaii. That included 289 people who bought a home in the last two years and 401
likely to buy a home within the next two years.

Results were weighted to represent the population by demographic factors
such as age, sex, region, race and income. No more than one time in 20 should
chance variations in the sample cause the results to vary by more than plus or
minus 3 percentage points from the answers that would be obtained if all people
in the U.S. were polled. The margin of error for those who bought homes within
the last 2 years was plus or minus 6 percentage points, while the margin of
error for those who are likely to buy a home in the next 2 years was plus or
minus 5 percentage points. There are other sources of potential error in polls, including the wording
and order of questions. Results may not total 100 percent because of rounding.
An “X” signifies less than 1 percent. 1. During the past two years, did you buy a house or condominium, or not? —Yes, 16 percent —No, 84 percent 2. How likely is it that you will buy a house or condominium in the next two
years? Is it almost certain, very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or
will you definitely not buy a house or condominium during the next two years? —Almost certain, 7 percent —Very likely, 8 percent —Somewhat likely, 10 percent —Not too likely, 21 percent —Definitely will not buy, 53 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total almost certain/very likely/somewhat likely—26 percent Total not too likely/will not buy—74 percent 3. Do you currently own your home, or do you rent? —Own, 70 percent —Rent, 28 percent —Not sure, 2 percent 4. Do you think the housing market in your area is overpriced, under priced,
or do you think the market is priced about right? —Overpriced, 46 percent —Underpriced, 5 percent —About right, 45 percent —Not sure, 4 percent 5. During the next (two years), do you think housing prices in your area
will go up, go down, or stay about the same? —Go up, 49 percent —Go down, 18 percent —Stay about the same, 32 percent —Not sure, 1 percent 6. In general, how difficult do you think it is for most first-time
homebuyers to afford a home? —Very difficult, 40 percent —Somewhat difficult, 40 percent —Not too difficult, 13 percent —Not at all difficult, 5 percent —Not sure, 2 percent Total difficult—80 percent Total not difficult—18 percent 7. Do you think it is more difficult, less difficult, or about as difficult
for first-time homebuyers to afford a home as it was 5 years ago? —More difficult, 59 percent —Less difficult, 14 percent —About the same, 26 percent —Not sure, 1 percent 8. I’m going to read you a list of factors that might be important in buying
or renting a home. For each one, please tell me if this factor is very
important, somewhat important, not too important, or not at all important to you
in buying or renting a home. How about … Price —Very important, 79 percent —Somewhat important, 18 percent —Not too important, 2 percent —Not at all important, 1 percent Total important—97 percent Total not important—3 percent Location close to work —Very important, 42 percent —Somewhat important, 40 percent —Not too important, 12 percent —Not at all important, 6 percent Total important—82 percent Total not important—18 percent Quality of schools in the area —Very important, 68 percent —Somewhat important, 15 percent —Not too important, 9 percent —Not at all important, 8 percent Total important—83 percent Total not important—18 percent Pleasant views —Very important, 28 percent —Somewhat important, 48 percent —Not too important, 17 percent —Not at all important, 6 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total important—77 percent Total not important—22 percent Square footage —Very important, 45 percent —Somewhat important, 45 percent —Not too important, 7 percent —Not at all important, 2 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total important—90 percent Total not important—10 percent Closet and storage space —Very important, 54 percent —Somewhat important, 37 percent —Not too important, 7 percent —Not at all important, 2 percent Total important—91 percent Total not important—9 percent Outdoor space and landscaping —Very important, 40 percent —Somewhat important, 45 percent —Not too important, 12 percent —Not at all important, 3 percent Total important—85 percent Total not important—15 percent Quality of construction and plumbing —Very important, 87 percent —Somewhat important, 11 percent —Not too important, 1 percent —Not at all important, 1 percent Total important—98 percent Total not important—2 percent Possibility of appreciation in value —Very important, 57 percent —Somewhat important, 34 percent —Not too important, 6 percent —Not at all important, 3 percent Total important—91 percent Total not important—9 percent (Questions 9-11 held for future release) (QUESTIONS 12a.-16 ASKED OF RECENT HOMEBUYERS) Thinking about the most recent house or condominium you bought 12a. Approximately how far is this house or condominium from your previous
residence? Please estimate the distance in miles. —1 mile or less, 15 percent —2 to 3 miles, 11 percent —4 to 5 miles, 12 percent —6 to 10 miles, 12 percent —11 to 25 miles, 16 percent —26 to 50 miles, 8 percent —51 to 500 miles, 9 percent —More than 500 miles, 15 percent —Not sure, 2 percent

Median -- 9.7
12b. Approximately how far is this house or condominium from your work?

Please estimate the distance in miles.

—1 mile or less, 19 percent —2 to 3 miles, 9 percent —4 to 5 miles, 5 percent —6 to 10 miles, 15 percent —11 to 15 miles, 22 percent —16 to 20 miles, 10 percent —21 to 25 miles, 2 percent —26 to 50 miles, 11 percent —More than 50 miles, 5 percent —Not employed, 13 percent —Not sure, 1 percent

Median -- 7.8
13. What tools or resources did you use in your search for a house or

condominium? Did you

Use a professional real estate agent —Yes, 62 percent —No, 38 percent Use the Internet —Yes, 53 percent —No, 47 percent Check print newspaper ads —Yes, 40 percent —No, 60 percent Visit open houses —Yes, 37 percent —No, 63 percent Use friends or family —Yes, 55 percent —No, 45 percent Drive or walk around looking for “for sale” signs —Yes, 51 percent —No, 49 percent 14. How did you FIRST learn about the house or condominium you bought? Was
it —Through a professional real estate agent, 32 percent —Through friends or family, 29 percent —Driving or walking around looking for “for sale” signs, 19 percent —On the Internet, 11 percent —Through newspaper ads, 6 percent —I built it, 3 percent —In some other way, 2 percent Thinking about the most recent house or condominium you bought 15. Overall, would you rate your home buying experience as positive or
negative? Is that very (positive/negative) or somewhat (positive/negative)? —Very positive, 51 percent —Somewhat positive, 37 percent —Somewhat negative, 9 percent —Very negative, 3 percent Total positive—88 percent Total negative—12 percent 16. Was this the first house or condominium you have ever purchased, or not? —Yes, 40 percent —No, 60 percent (QUESTIONS 17-21 ASKED OF LIKELY HOMEBUYERS) 17. Are you currently actively looking to buy a house or condominium, or
not? —Yes (actively looking), 40 percent —No, 60 percent 18. When thinking about buying a house or condominium, how much do you worry
about each of the following? How about Paying above the fair market value at the time —A lot, 39 percent —Some, 39 percent —Not too much, 11 percent —Not at all, 10 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total a lot/some—78 percent Total not too much/not at all—21 percent The potential that the home will decline in value —A lot, 27 percent —Some, 35 percent —Not too much, 22 percent —Not at all, 15 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total a lot/some—62 percent Total not too much/not at all—37 percent Finding enough money for the down payment —A lot, 34 percent —Some, 24 percent —Not too much, 20 percent —Not at all, 22 percent Total a lot/some—58 percent Total not too much/not at all—41 percent Being able to afford the mortgage payment —A lot, 40 percent —Some, 25 percent —Not too much, 16 percent —Not at all, 19 percent Total a lot/some—65 percent Total not too much/not at all—35 percent Rising interest rates —A lot, 46 percent —Some, 39 percent —Not too much, 9 percent —Not at all, 6 percent Total a lot/some—84 percent Total not too much/not at all—16 percent Not being able to afford the kind of home you really want —A lot, 34 percent —Some, 29 percent —Not too much, 20 percent —Not at all, 17 percent Total a lot/some—63 percent Total not too much/not at all—37 percent Not being able to find a home that you like —A lot, 24 percent —Some, 40 percent —Not too much, 19 percent —Not at all, 16 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Total a lot/some—64 percent Total not too much/not at all—35 percent Not being able to find a home in the area where you want to live —A lot, 36 percent —Some, 28 percent —Not too much, 16 percent —Not at all, 20 percent Total a lot/some—64 percent Total not too much/not at all—36 percent 19. Which of the following resources are you using or do you expect to use
in your search for a house or condominium? How about Using a professional real estate agent —Yes, 71 percent —No, 28 percent —Not sure, 1 percent Using the Internet —Yes, 74 percent —No, 26 percent Checking print newspaper ads —Yes, 69 percent —No, 31 percent Visiting open houses —Yes, 70 percent —No, 30 percent Using friends or family —Yes, 67 percent —No, 33 percent Driving or walking around looking for “for sale” signs —Yes, 67 percent —No, 33 percent (Question 20 held for later use) 21. Will this be the first house or condominium you have ever purchased, or
not? —Yes, 53 percent —No, 47 percent (QUESTION 22 ASKED OF UNLIKELY HOMEBUYERS) 22. What is the MAIN reason you say you are unlikely to buy a house or
condominium in the next two years? (open-ended) —I like the home I have now, 25 percent —Can’t afford a new home, 16 percent —Don’t need a new home, 11 percent —Don’t want to move, 10 percent —Recently bought a home, 10 percent —Age/too old, 3 percent —Housing prices are too high, 3 percent —I’ve made an investment in my current home, 3 percent —I own my home, 2 percent —Retired, 1 percent —Want to wait until prices drop, 1 percent —Unemployed, student, 1 percent —Can’t afford a down payment, 1 percent —May move out of the area, 1 percent —Interest rates are too high, 1 percent —Children are in school, X percent —Not a U.S. citizen/not from here, X percent —Other (specify), 5 percent —Nothing, 1 percent —Not sure, 5 percent (QUESTIONS 23-25 ASKED OF HOMEBUYERS WHO USED/EXPECT TO USE THE INTERNET) 23. What would you say is the best feature available when conducting real
estate research online? —Photos of properties, 19 percent —Search capabilities, 14 percent —Variety and volume of listings, 10 percent —Virtual tours, 9 percent —More information available, 4 percent —Ease of use, 3 percent —Accessibility, 3 percent —Free listings, 1 percent —Price, 1 percent —Other, 24 percent —Not sure, 16 percent 24. Have you ever taken an online virtual tour of a home, or not? —Yes, 71 percent —No, 29 percent 25. Where would you say you spent the most time online searching real estate
listings? —At home, 83 percent —At work, 11 percent —Both equally (volunteered), 3 percent —Not sure, 3 percent

Property For Sale Bonalba Costa Blanca Spain

September 12th, 2006

Property For Sale: Las Lomas Phase 4, Bonalba Golf Course, Costa Blanca, Spain

Was completed in October 2005 a brand new 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom apartment 94m2, with allocated underground parking space & use of communal pool & sports facilities. Located & overlooking the Bonalba golf course. Also offering uninterrupted views towards San Juan and Alicante. Phase 4 has been built as a unique circular building, currently the only one on the Bonalba development.

This apartment is one of the biggest in the development.

Price 180,000 Euro FOR A QUICK SALE.

On completion the property was valued at 212,000 Euro. The developers are selling similar for 221,172 Euro.

Email: bonalba@market-trend.co.uk

Moscow Office Rents Overtake Paris, Zurich, Behind London

September 7th, 2006

Sept. 7 (Bloomberg)—Moscow has the second-highest rents for prime office space in Europe after it overtook Paris and Zurich in the second quarter, according to a study by Jones Lang LaSalle.

The annual cost of renting commercial premises at locations such as the Red Square area jumped 60 percent in the 12 months to June 30 to about $1,200 a square meter ($112 a square foot), the study released late yesterday showed. London is the only European city with a higher rate, the property consultant said.

Demand for the best premises in the Russian capital, Europe’s largest city by population, is surging as companies hire more staff. Moscow has about a fifth of the office space of Paris, in part because there was no commercial property market prior to the Soviet collapse in 1991.

There is a huge undersupply of office space on the market,'' said Olga Baturina, a senior research analyst at Jones Lang LaSalle in Moscow.Developers became aware of the high demand too late.’’

Moscow has 12 million square meters of office space, compared with about 29.2 million in London and 48.8 million in Paris, according to Jones Lang LaSalle. The lack of space and high prices has forced some companies to move into converted factories and institutions. Moscow’s population is about 10.5 million.

Prime real estate prices will extend their increase this year and next before stabilizing in 2008 and 2009, when many office projects are due to be completed, Baturina said. ``Prices are unlikely to go down.’’

President’s Office

The most costly commercial real estate is around Red Square and the Kremlin, where President Vladimir Putin works. Some transactions have reached an annual $1,500 a square meter in the area, according to Jones Lang LaSalle.

Rents for London’s most prestigious office space amounted to about $1,710 a year, the survey showed. The rate refers to the most paid for premises of at least 1,000 square meters. Paris is third at $933, followed by Zurich at $819, Geneva at $771 and Dublin at $715. Amsterdam was 15th on the list with $415.

Moscow passed Tokyo to become the world’s most expensive city this year after accommodation costs surged, a survey by Mercer Human Resource Consulting showed in June.

Russia’s richest men, including Vladimir Yevtushenkov and Vladimir Potanin, the nation’s 8th and 9th wealthiest individuals, are seeking to exploit rising prices and demand for office space.

Potanin’s Fund

Open Investments, which is controlled by Potanin’s Interros Co., plans to raise about $850 million this month in a share sale partly for commercial real estate projects. Competitor Sistema- Hals, which is controlled by Yevtushenkov, may seek to raise around $1 billion for real estate projects in a November share sale.

``Office prices will rise further, but as a reflection of inflation and the strong ruble,’’ Open Investments Chief Executive Officer Sergei Bachin said today in a telephone interview. Open Investments may purchase a plot of land in the center of Moscow to develop a building, Bachin said.

The Russian ruble has climbed 7.7 percent against the dollar this year. Russian inflation may top 9 percent in 2006.

Moscow will gain about 1.5 million square meters of office space when Moscow City, the capital’s biggest commercial real estate project that will include Europe’s tallest building, is completed in 2011, Baturina said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Todd Prince in Moscow at tprince2@bloomberg.net ; Bradley Cook in Moscow at bcook7@bloomberg.net .

10 priciest US cities for renters

August 22nd, 2006

10 priciest cities for renters

                                                             City Avg. rent                Annual rent chng.           Occupancy

New York** $2,469 NA 97.10%

San Francisco $1,945 8.8% 97.4%

Los Angeles $1,586 6.5% 97.5%

San Jose, Calif. $1,487 11.6% 98.2%

Orange County, Calif. $1,387 6.0% 96.8%

Boston $1,332 2.1% 96.7%

Oakland $1,245 5.8% 96.8%

San Diego $1,213 3.1% 97.1%

Washington, DC $1,205 4.5% 97.4%

Fort Lauderdale, Fla. $1,134 9.7% 97.5%

*Source: M/PF Yieldstar; second-quarter snapshot

**Source: REIS Inc.

House prices in the US set to drop for the 1st time ever ?

July 30th, 2006

HOUSE prices are set to drop in the US for the first time on record, US investment bank Goldman Sachs warned this weekend.

Prices in several segments of the market have already started to fall, and the overall market will move into the red even in nominal terms next year, fuelling fears that this will trigger a downturn in consumer spending and hit an already slowing US economy.

Jan Hatzius, economist at Goldman Sachs, said: “The risk is rising that nominal US home prices may be headed for an outright decline in 2007. It would be the first decline in national home prices ever recorded, at least in nominal terms.”

In real terms, prices have declined during several periods, including a 9% drop from 1979 to 1984.

In a special analysis of the data, the Goldman economists found that seasonally adjusted US house prices were already falling in dollar terms. The nominal median price of a single-family home has been declining slightly at a 1% annualised rate since the fourth quarter of 2005, the research shows.

The median price of a condo or co-op apartment has been falling more steeply at a 9% annual rate. Hatzius said: “It is not surprising to see relatively greater weakness in the condo and co-op market, which is much more concentrated in overheated coastal parts of the United States”.

Asking prices, according to the real estate brokers’ multiple listing services, are also weak. Goldman’s proprietary database covering 52 regional markets shows that, on a population-weighted basis, the median asking price is up only about 2% since last summer.

Given the reported sharp decline in bidding wars over the last year and the increasing willingness of sellers to accept lower offers, this is probably also consistent with a drop in home price inflation into negative territory, the report says.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s index is also likely to show a sharp slowdown for the rest of this year. As of the first quarter of 2006, this index was up 10.1% year-on-year, extremely close to the 10.4% year-on-year increase seen in the National Association of Realtors median-price data.

Goldman is forecasting that the year-on-year Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s index growth could fall to 4% by the second or third quarter of 2006, and possibly into negative territory in 2007.

The bad news on house prices comes after the US economy slowed to an annualised 2.5% in the second quarter, down from 5.6% in the first quarter. This fuelled hopes in the markets that there could be an end the Federal Reserve’s rate hike campaign, which would boost share prices, even though the core inflation measure favoured by the Fed increased at an excessively strong annualised rate of 2.9%.

The Dow gained 119.27 points on Friday, or 1.07%, closing at 11,219.70. It posted its best weekly point gain since May 2005 as investors regained hope that the crisis in the Middle East would remain contained.

Source: thebusinessonline.com

Finance & Investing Forum

July 18th, 2006

Talk with like minded individuals about real estate, stock markets, forex, tax issues, personal finance and much more at TalkFinances.com

First time buyer trades a paper clip to a house in 14 trades

July 13th, 2006

It took one year for Kyle MacDonald to trade a paper clip for a house, but after 14 trades, the deal is complete. Tomorrow, the blogger from Belcarra, B.C., will move into a two-storey, three-bedroom, 1920s farmhouse in Kipling, Sask.

He started trading up from just a small red paper clip on July 12 of last year, and has traded a pen for a doorknob, a camping stove for a generator, an “instant party kit” for a Bombardier Mach 1 snowmobile, and finally a part in the movie Donna on Demand for his final prize.

“I’m really pleased,” said Mr. MacDonald, 26. “I’ve never been to Kipling, but I’ve seen pictures of the house, and it looks great. It looks perfect.”

The genesis of the project was a children’s game called “bigger and better.” Growing up in the suburbs of Vancouver, neighbours would go door to door trying to trade their toys for something more valuable. Mr. MacDonald never played the game but decided to use the concept to show that all journeys begin with a small first step.

“It’s a cliché, but it works,” he said. “I didn’t know how I was going to get to my goal of a house, or how long it would take me, or where the house would be, but I figured that if I kept at it, I would get there in the end.”

The town of Kipling decided to make the offer for the publicity, Mayor Pat Jackson said. “We are a small community, just over 1,100 people. We are trying to promote tourism. And who knows, maybe someone out there will think, ‘This sounds like an interesting town,’ and decide to move here. That would be just wonderful.”

Over the weekend and yesterday, volunteers painted, cleaned and repaired the house. About 20 volunteers have painted the trim red.

“This competition is an a economic and psychological boost for the town,” Ms. Jackson said. “We are not living in a boom economy in this town, because the price of crops [is] down. So this competition means a lot to our small community.”

The town plans to hold “the world’s largest party” and auditions for the Donna on Demand role over the Labour Day weekend, Ms. Jackson said. “We expect a lot of people will come to visit the town to try out for the movie. People will come here, spend money and see all that our town has to offer.”

When the town first made its offer a few weeks ago, Mr. MacDonald responded and entered into negotiations. In the end, Mr. MacDonald won not just a house but the key to the town, and the opportunity to be mayor for one day.

The town council also decreed that the day of the trade would be known as “One Red Paper Clip Day.” The council also plans to build the world’s largest paper clip, which has to be larger than the current record of about 11 metres, Ms. Jackson said.

Mr. MacDonald said he is looking forward to the move. He didn’t know what he would do once there, but he planned to write a book about the whole project. His girlfriend, Dominique Dupuis, 26, has also quit her job as a nutritionist to follow him to Kipling.

“I’m very excited,” she said. “The people of Kipling are so into the project. They all got together last weekend to clean and paint the house. It’s not every day that a small town gets together to welcome you into their town. It’s going to be a new adventure.”

Source: Firstrung.com

Real estate still sizzling in Canada

July 6th, 2006

The Canadian housing market is still hot, and searingly so in Western Canada, and is expected to remain so through the rest of this year and into next, a major real estate firm said Wednesday.

Nationally, the average price of a home in the second quarter of this year was 14.2 per cent higher than a year earlier, and up more than 50 per cent higher in Calgary and more than 30 per cent in Edmonton, according to Royal LePage, which is forecasting a 9.2 per cent increase in prices nationally this year.

Both sales and prices continued to rise across the country in the April-June quarter, it said.

“The pace of growth varied greatly by region, with activity levels and price increases in the western provinces far outpacing that in the rest of the country,” it said. “Compared to the same period last year, Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada maintained similar high sales volumes, with moderate price increases, while extraordinary demand and limited inventory drove double-digit price increases in the West.”

But as hot as the housing market is, another major real estate firm—CENTURY 21 —said the pace of activity will ease during the lazy-hazy days of summer, allowing buyers more time to look before they leap into the market and sellers time to spruce up homes that failed to sell in the spring rush.

“This summer’s housing market is offering buyers real-estate opportunities that were not available during the record-breaking spring market,” said CENTURY 21 president Don Lawby. “Earlier in the year, buyers in many parts of the country had to act instantly or lose the deal. In some cases, sellers have reduced their asking prices after failing to sell in the spring because they tried to make a killing during the market frenzy.”

However, both real-estate firms are forecasting the market for housing will remain healthy, reflecting the economy and job market.

Nationally, the average house price will rise to $272,200 by the end of 2006, while sales will edge up 0.4 per cent to 485,000, Royal LePage predicted.

Source: Canada.com

Reports of The Real Estate Bubble Burst Are Greatly Exaggerated!

June 20th, 2006

The Reserve at Woodbridge Condo Conversion in Bluffton, S.C. Achieves a 75% Sellout!

BLUFFTON, S.C., June 20 /PRNewswire/—Paramount Properties of Florida hit a grand slam on Saturday, June 10th as an astonishing 75% of the 214 available units at The Reserve at Woodbridge were sold during the Grand Sales event.

According to Paramount CEO Tom Cabrerizo, “The feedback we had been getting indicated that interest in The Reserve at Woodbridge was going to be high, but selling the majority of the units by the end of the Grand Opening was beyond our most optimistic projections.”

Cabrerizo has also been witness to many previous successes in the same area. He goes on to say, “We’re in the condo-conversion business. We recognized there’s a lack of affordable real estate in that market, in that location. We did a similar conversion in Bradenton and we sold out about 90 percent in 30 hours. It was exceptional.”

Sales and marketing for The Reserve is being handled by N5R. Roman Bodnarchuk, N5R’s founder and CEO, was equally jubilant. “We are delighted with the fact that 75% of the project is sold but also want the public to know that there are still units available at opening prices starting in the low $100’s. We anticipate that they will be snapped up real soon.”

The Reserve at Woodbridge is situated in the exclusive Woodbridge Residential Community, one of the most prestigious addresses in the Greater Bluffton Area. The Reserve epitomizes the refined sense of community South Carolina’s Low Country is renowned for and has great appeal for buyers who seek an upscale alternative to the mature developments on nearby Hilton Head Island.

It has also been designed to take advantage of Bluffton’s famed natural beauty and the relaxed “Low Country lifestyle” so appealing to visitors and residents of the area. Windows and balconies look out upon Beaufort County’s peaceful wooded wetlands. Some of the noteworthy amenities include a resort-style swimming pool, full-featured business and fitness centers and an exclusive “members only” clubhouse. The interiors have been completely renovated with a nod to convenience and luxury. The Reserve at Woodbridge accurately reflects Paramount’s extensive experience with condo conversions and is certain to achieve similar success!

ABOUT PARAMOUNT

Paramount Companies of Florida, headquartered in Miami, Florida, is a leading Real Estate developer with over 25 years of trusted commercial, residential and industrial property experience. Paramount currently oversees the day-to-day operations of over 750,000 square feet of commercial and retail space, and their impressive residential portfolio includes communities throughout the US, with over 10,000 units nationwide as well as condominium conversions throughout Florida, Georgia and South Carolina.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact:

N5R Nelson Hudes (905) 660-9155

DATASOURCE: N5R

CONTACT: Nelson Hudes of N5R, +1-905-660-9155,

Web site: http://www.n5r.com/